Originally posted by CS911E
View Post
With that in mind, I took a look at the abovementioned car on the weekend. It is a UK delivered car so original RHD, It is an E which I thought was more desirable than a T (higher HP) except for the hydropneumatic suspension - or am I incorrect on this assumption?
A couple of other observations on it FWIW:
- It looks like the tan seats have been swapped in or the door panels have been redone as I thought both should be the same colour? What sort of vinyl should be on the door panels - basketweave or a more standard vinyl?
- The decklid grill is incorrect.
- it didn't have door pockets.
- the colour is incorrect and should be Albert Blue as the paint code is 1818 and has an L after it (what does the "L" stand for?).
- the sunroof works but doesn't close without some manual assistance.
- the engine is obviously incorrect (from a '73), but it is an E spec engine.
- no original radio (and door panels cut for speakers....).
- Looks to have had a hit to the front at some point.
- The doors had some rust in them. The big question mark I have is how much rust is there that I didn't see (especially being a UK car).
- I didn't realise Fuchs could be finished that poorly, but apparently they can.
Are H4 headlights correct for a '71?
Did cars with Fuchs typically have a Fuchs spare?
Interested if anyone has any comments/views on it (in addition to the post earlier). Any feedback/debate/answers appreciated.
Cam
Comment